-
Beyond the Atmosphere:
Early Years of Space Science
-
-
-
- CHAPTER 9
-
- SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
-
-
-
- [130] In seeking
to bring the scientific community into the space science program
and in insisting on publication of results in the open literature,
NASA could hardly escape a close association with the scientific
societies. The societies afforded the most common meeting ground
of the scientists, and their journals formed much of the open
literature.
-
- A number of scientific societies soon
became involved. The American Astronomical Society's interest was
at first tentative, although a number of its leading members were
fully committed to space astronomy-like Richard Tousey of the
Naval Research. Laboratory, Leo Goldberg of the University of
Michigan, Gerard Kuiper of Yerkes Observatory, and Lyman Spitzer
of Princeton. Spitzer had been among the first, in the mid-1940s,
to write about and advocate the use of satellites for astronomical
research. In the sounding rocket program of the 1940s and 1950s,
Tousey had been one of the pioneers in rocket astronomy. And no
sooner had NASA opened its doors than Leo Goldberg was urging
support of a solar astronomical satellite project which the
McDonnell Aircraft Company had designed with advice from
University of Michigan astronomers. Under the pressure of such
widespread interest, the American Astronomical Society's
participation grew steadily throughout the 1960s. Papers appeared
in its journal and at its meetings, and the society began to
promote important aspects of space astronomy. The spectacular
results of planetary missions, particularly in 1969 and early
1970s, helped dispel the disdain and lack of interest with which
astronomers had regarded the planetary field for decades.
-
- Among the first learned societies to show
strong interest were the American Physical Society and the
American Geophysical Union. In April 1959-six months into NASA's
first full year-the Physical Society sponsored, along with NASA
and the National Academy of Sciences, a symposium on space
physics, which was well attended.42 Anticipating the importance of space science for
extending geophysics to other planets, the Geophysical Union went
even further. In November 1959, AGU officers considered the
question of providing a home for space science. Encouraged by the
show of interest, NASA's Robert Jastrow and Gordon J. F.
MacDonald, a brilliant young geophysicist, on 10 December 1959
wrote to President Lloyd Berkner recommending that the union
create a section on planetary physics.43 After consulting with AGU officers, Berkner
responded by inviting the author to become chairman of a Planning
Committee on Planetary Science, with members Jastrow (secretary),
Leroy Alldredge, Joseph W. Chamberlain, Thomas Gold, MacDonald,
Hugh Odishaw, Alan Shapley, Harry Vestine, Harry Wexler, Charles
Whitten, and Philip Abelson (and later Walter Orr Roberts), all of
whom had had important roles in the International Geophysical Year
program. For the next two years the committee organized sessions
on space science for the union meetings, and promoted the
interests of space science within the union. [131] For the
summer of 1960 committee members prepared a series of papers
reporting on progress in the planetary and interplanetary sciences
for publication in the Transactions
of the American Geophysical Union.
The President's Page in the Transactions for
September 1960 carried a note from the author pointing out the
importance of space science to geophysics and calling attention to
the existence of the Planning Committee on Planetary
Sciences.44
-
- Within the union there was a steady
movement toward the creation of a new section on the planetary
sciences. But space science was itself but an extension of the
traditional disciplines, and there was opposition to the proposed
action. The argument was that the existing sections of AGU could
provide the desired home for the new activities in space. The
section on meteorology, for example, could accommodate satellite
meteorology. Any section dealing with an aspect of the earth
sciences could house that same aspect of the planetary sciences.
In fact, some feared that a separate section on the planetary
sciences would become another little union within the overall
union. Even members thoroughly involved in the space sciences-like
John Simpson, experimenter on Pioneer and Explorer satellites,
theoretical physicist Alexander Dessler, and Harry Wexler,
director of research for the U.S. Weather Bureau-were opposed.
Nevertheless, the strong coherence in the space sciences,
generated by the peculiarities and demands of the space tools,
sparked the push for a new section. The spring of 1961 saw a great
deal of discussion of the matter, and at its 22 April 1961 meeting
the council of the union approved in principle the formation of a
new section-by a margin of one vote! The council asked that the
entire organizational structure, activity, and nomenclature of the
union be reviewed as a precaution against intolerable dislocations
within the society from addition of the new section. The review
concluded that no other changes were required, and on 25 April
1962 the council gave final approval for the formation of a
section on planetary sciences (which later in the decade divided
into several groups). The author became the first president of the
section, and Jastrow its first secretary, thus symbolizing the
close relations that NASA had developed with the American
Geophysical Union.
-
- The examples given here are only
illustrative. The breadth of the space sciences generated an
important association with many scientific and technical societies
and institutes. The interest of the American Rocket Society and
the Institute of Aeronautical Sciences-which soon merged into the
new American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics-was an
obvious one, as was that of the American Astronautical Society and
the International Astronautical Federation, although their concern
tended more toward the engineering and technology side of the
picture. More directly concerned with space science were the
Optical Society of America, the International Astronomical Union
the American Meteorological Society, the Geological Society of
America, the American Institute of Biological Sciences, and a
[132] long list of others. For some of these,
interest in space science flared up at the very start, while for
others the interest gradually emerged as the program
unfolded.
-
- Inheriting so much from the International
Geophysical Year, NASA had an international program from the
outset.45 There were two main arenas, that of the
international scientific circles such as the International Council
of Scientific Unions and its newly formed Committee on Space
Research, and that of a political nature, falling generally in the
sphere of the United Nations. There were numerous political
considerations relative to space, and NASA was immediately drawn
into United Nations deliberations on space matters.
-
- But the natural arena for space science
was the international scientific community, and from the start
NASA gave strong support to the Committee on Space Research. Among
the unions of the council represented on COSPAR were the
International Union of Scientific Radio and the International
Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, which had first recommended the
use of scientific satellites during the International Geophysical
Year. Following the organizing meeting convened by the author in
London in November of 1958, COSPAR held its first full-scale
business session in The Hague, 12-14 March
1959.46 At that meeting Richard Porter of the Space Science
Board, U.S. representative to COSPAR, asked the author whether the
United States might offer to launch space science experiments for
COSPAR members. In a phone call to Washington, the author obtained
Hugh Dryden's approval to inform the meeting that NASA would be
willing to do so. Porter then wrote to President H. C. van de
Hulst, saying that the United States would accept single
experiments as part of larger payloads, or would launch complete
payloads prepared by other countries.47 The response to the U.S. invitation was immediate,
and before the year was out a number of cooperative projects had
begun. With the Soviet Union, genuine cooperation proved to be
difficult during the 1960s, less difficult in the 1970s climate of
detente. These subjects are discussed at length in chapter 18.
-
- As the leaders of NASA worked to reshape
the NACA into an aeronautics and space organization, they also
laid the foundation for the many relationships with other
government agencies, industry, and the scientific community that
played an essential role in planning and conducting the program.
But none of this would have been of any avail without the
principal tools, the rockets and spacecraft essential to the
investigation and exploration of space. A first order of business
as to provide for these tools. That NASA set about to do, striving
to overcome as soon as possible the visible gap that lay between
the United States and the Soviet Union in propulsion capabilities
and launchable spacecraft weights. Because of the central
importance of launch vehicles and their payloads, the next chapter
is devoted entirely to them.
-
-
-


-