-
Quest for Performance: The Evolution
of Modern Aircraft
-
-
- Part II: THE JET AGE
-
-
- Chapter 10: Technology of the Jet
Airplane
-
-
- Jet Propulsion
-
-
-
- [223] The speed
at which a conventional propeller-driven aircraft may fly
efficiently is fundamentally limited by the loss in propeller
efficiency that occurs as the tip speed approaches a Mach number
of 1.0. (See chapter 5.) One of the important advantages of jet-type
propulsion systems is that they overcome this fundamental
limitation. The air intake and internal flow systems for jet
engines are designed in such a way as to limit the velocity of the
air at the first stage of compressor blading so that severe
adverse Mach number effects are not encountered.
-
- Another advantage found in jet propulsion
systems is the small weight per unit power and the tremendous
amount of power that can be packaged in a single unit. An
interesting illustration of the power [224] and weight
features of jet propulsion can be obtained from the following
comparison of some of the characteristics of the modern Boeing 747
Jetliner and the earlier propeller-driven Lockheed 1049G Super
Constellation. The Super Constellation is typical of the final
generation of high- performance, piston-engine transports and is
described in chapter 6. The total power, the power per engine, and the
ratio of power to dry engine weight of the two aircraft are
compared in the following tabulation:
-
-
-
-
| Characteristic |
Lockheed 1049G |
Boeing 747 |
|
Weight, W, lb
|
112 000
|
700 000
|
|
Speed, V, mph
|
330
|
530
|
|
Altitude, ft
|
23 000
|
35 000
|
|
Lift-drag ratio, L/D
|
15
|
16
|
|
Number of engines
|
4
|
4
|
|
Total cruise power, hp
|
6 585
|
59 934
|
|
Power per engine, hp
|
1 646
|
14 984
|
|
Dry engine weight, lb
|
3 675
|
8 600
|
|
Power to weight ratio
|
0.45
|
1.74
|
-
-
- In this case, the power is defined as the
total amount of power usefully employed in propelling the aircraft
at the assumed used conditions of weight, speed, and lift-drag
ratio. The power in the tabulation may be thought of as being
proportional to the total number of British thermal units supplied
to the engine per unit time multiplied by the overall efficiency
with which this energy is converted to useful work; that
is,
-
-
-
-
-
- where P is in horsepower and V is in feet
per second. The given values of W, V, and L/D employed in the
equation are only estimates that may not be entirely consistent
but are thought to be sufficiently accurate for the present
purpose.
-
- The Boeing 747 cruising at 530 miles per
hour at a weight of 700 000 pounds is seen to require 59 934
horsepower; the corresponding values for the Super Constellation
are 330 miles per hour, 112 000 pounds, and 6585 horsepower. The
power per engine for the two aircraft is seen to be 14 984
horsepower and 1646 horsepower for the 747 and Super
Constellation, respectively. The Wright 3350 turbocompound engines
that powered the Lockheed aircraft are among the most powerful
reciprocating engines ever developed for aircraft use. These
engines developed a maximum of 3250 horsepower at takeoff; the
value given in the table is for a normal cruise power setting. The
enormous amount of power generated by the Pratt & Whitney
turbofan engines of the 747 as compared with the reciprocating
engines that propelled the Super Constellation is obvious. The
values of power-to-weight ratio for the two types of propulsion
systems are also of great interest. The weights used in this ratio
are the dry, uninstalled engine weights as given in reference
205. The turbine engines in the Boeing aircraft develop
nearly four times as much power for each pound of engine weight as
do the reciprocating engines that power the Lockheed
aircraft.
-
- The jet propulsion system avoids the
compressibility problem that limits the speed at which the
propeller may be efficiently employed, is light in weight for a
given amount of power as compared with a reciprocating engine, and
can be successfully produced in single units capable of generating
very large amounts of power jet propulsion systems also require
much less maintenance than do reciprocating engines and may be
operated for many thousands of hours without major overhaul.
Engine failures are also relatively rare with jet propulsion
systems.
-
-

