-
Quest for Performance: The Evolution
of Modern Aircraft
-
-
- Part II: THE JET AGE
-
-
- Chapter 13: Jet Transports
-
-
- Background
-
-
-
- [407] The development
and design features of jet transport aircraft from the pioneering
DeHavilland Comet of 1949 to the wide-body jets of today are
briefly described in this chapter. The particular aircraft
discussed were selected because of their significance in the
evolution of the modern jet transport, or because they are
representative of an important configuration type, or because they
are particularly successful. No attempt is made to describe all
the jet transport aircraft developed since the end of World War
II.
-
- Successful jet transports tend to have
long operational careers and are usually produced in many
versions. Engine changes and improvements, changes in wing area
and high-lift systems, aerodynamic and structural refinements, and
modernization of onboard systems may take place during the
production life of a successful aircraft type. "Stretching" is
another modification technique frequently employed. In this case,
the fuselage is lengthened by the addition of "barrel sections" so
that the passenger capacity of the aircraft is accordingly
increased. A description of the sometimes numerous versions of a
particular aircraft is beyond the scope of the present discussion.
A representative version of a particular aircraft will be
described here; information on the different versions may be
obtained from the references contained at the end of this
book.
-
- The aircraft discussed are listed in
table
VII (appendix A), together with
some of their important physical and performance characteristics.
Although the terms used in table VII are defined in the list of symbols given in
appendix
B, clarifying remarks about several
of these quantities are in order. The range-payload diagram is so
fundamental to the understanding of transport aircraft performance
that a brief description is provided at this point. A hypothetical
range-payload diagram is given in figure 13.1 in which the range
is plotted on the abscissa; [408] and the payload,
on the ordinate. Point B corresponds to maximum aircraft gross
weight and maximum payload weight with all available seats and
cargo space filled but with fuel tanks only partially filled. The
gross weight of the aircraft remains the same along the line
segment BC, but fuel weight is exchanged for payload weight; that
is, payload is off-loaded and the fuel tanks are completely full
at point C. Along the line segment D, increases in range are
achieved by further reductions in payload although no additional
fuel can be carried, and the gross weight is lower than the
maximum value. The gross weight of the aircraft along line segment
A is less than the maximum value, except at point B, and the fuel
load is reduced as the range is reduced. No...
-
-
-
-
- Figure 13. 1 - Hypothetical
range-payload diagram.
-
-
- [409]...increase in
payload is shown along line segment A because all
payload space is filled. The range at maximum payload, point
B, and the range and payload for full tanks, point C, are the two
combinations of range
and payload given in table VII. The range values given in the table are based on
utilization of all fuel onboard the aircraft; thus no
allowance is made for necessary reserve fuel to cover such
contingencies as diversion to an alternate airport, a missed
approach, or holding in the vicinity of an airport. All
passenger-carrying airline flights are required to carry a
specified amount of reserve fuel. One set of guidelines for
determining the necessary amount of reserve fuel is briefly
discussed in appendix G. Two cruising speeds are given in
table
VII. The maximum cruising speed is
given by the symbol Vce; the
cost-economical cruising speed is denoted by Vce, and is the
speed for minimum cost per mile. The landing and takeoff field
lengths given in the table are called FAR (Federal Air
Regulations) field lengths and contain certain built-in safety
margins. A simplified description of these field lengths is given
in appendix
H. Values of the zero-lift drag
coefficient and maximum lift-drag ratio are not given for the
aircraft listed in table VII. Such data are not generally available in the open
literature because of the highly competitive nature of the modern
jet-transport business. Values of these quantities (estimated by
the author according to the methods given in reference
176) are quoted in the text for several of the aircraft
described, but these values should not be interpreted as
necessarily being consistent with company estimates.
-
-

