-
Computers in Spaceflight: The NASA
Experience
-
- - Chapter Five -
-
- From Sequencers to Computers:
Exploring the Moon and the Inner Planets
-
-
- [140] One organization
more than any other has dominated the exploration of deep space:
the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) of the California Institute of
Technology. JPL was responsible for the Ranger and Surveyor series
of lunar exploration spacecraft, the Mariner and Viking Orbiter
explorers of Mercury, Venus, and Mars, and the Voyager and Galileo
probes of the outer planets. As a result, the evolution of
on-board computers for deep space operations took place at
JPL.
-
- JPL's chief contribution to computing on
unmanned spacecraft was in leading progress from hard-wired
sequencers to programmable sequencers to digital computers. The
Pioneer spacecraft developed mostly at NASA's Ames Research Center
and the Lunar Orbiters used to map the moon in the 1960s did not
carry on-board computers. Like their earth-orbiting cousins and
the first JPL probes, they used sequencing devices to activate and
command experiments. Later the Mariner spacecraft acquired more
autonomy and flexibility by using machines that stored command
sequences in changeable software. Finally, sophisticated
spacecraft flew with special-purpose digital computers.
-
- Unique in its relationship to NASA, JPL is
not solely a government installation in the same way as, for
example, the Johnson or Marshall Space flight Centers. JPL's
personnel receive their pay-checks from Cal Tech, yet almost every
piece of equipment on the site has a NASA property tag, since, for
over a quarter of a century, Cal Tech has administered contracts
that have paid for all research and development of the many
spacecraft originated at JPL.
-
- Another way in which JPL is unique is its
products. Whereas thousands of earth-orbiting satellites have been
launched, less than a dozen each of Rangers, Surveyors, and
Mariners were constructed, and just two Vikings and Voyagers and
one Galileo were sent into space. Not only were few spacecraft
built, but the interplanetary launches were separated by years and
had to be on strict deadlines due to the realities of celestial
mechanics. This created a completely different development
environment than that at other NASA centers. The emphasis on basic
research at JPL has perhaps been stronger than at any other NASA
installation. This orientation and its application in spacecraft
forms a special part of the story of JPL.
-
- JPL's computer development activities were
shaped by its organizational structures. When a project is started
at the Laboratory, an office is established to house the project
manager, key systems managers, and staff. Offices have come and
gone with the projects themselves. The Ranger office, for example,
has been closed for nearly 20 years, whereas the Voyager office is
likely to be open for as long as that. Most personnel are housed
in divisions and sections relating to specific discipline or
system functions, as, in 1984, the "Technical Divisions" contained
sections on "Guidance and Control" and "Spacecraft Data Systems."
When a project office needs a component or service, it
"subcontracts" it to the appropriate technical [141] sections. For
instance, Spacecraft Data Systems supplies on-board computers,
whereas the Navigation Systems Section does the trajectory
calculations needed for a specific mission. In this way,
specialists can be kept busy on a series of projects over a period
of years without depending on a specific project for their jobs.
Competition between sections to develop related components can
also exist, as on the Voyager project, when the attitude control
staff wanted to make their own computer for their system while the
data systems people claimed sole domain over computer development.
Within this setting, JPL has produced high quality on-board
computers that have demonstrated outstanding reliability.
*
-
* JPL's
roots and its role in NASA receive excellent treatment in Clayton
Koppes' The Jet Propulsion Lab and the American Space Program, Yale
University Press, 1982.

